REBRANDING NOTICE: EzDeploy is now Roptal. Platform launching on roptal.com. Docs: docs.roptal.com.REBRANDING NOTICE: EzDeploy is now Roptal. Platform launching on roptal.com. Docs: docs.roptal.com.REBRANDING NOTICE: EzDeploy is now Roptal. Platform launching on roptal.com. Docs: docs.roptal.com.REBRANDING NOTICE: EzDeploy is now Roptal. Platform launching on roptal.com. Docs: docs.roptal.com.
Oryvo
← All articles

Gradio vs Streamlit vs FastAPI: Which to Use for Your ML App

Three frameworks for ML apps targeting different use cases. Comparison of strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each.

Gradio vs Streamlit vs FastAPI: Which to Use for Your ML App

Three frameworks dominate ML application development. They target different use cases. Picking the wrong one means either rebuilding later or shipping a product with fundamental limitations.

Gradio

Built for ML model demos. Created by Hugging Face.

Strengths:

  • Auto-generates a UI from your model's input/output types
  • Built-in components for images, audio, text, dataframes
  • Hugging Face Spaces integration (deploy with one push)
  • Share with a public link in 1 line: demo.launch(share=True)
  • Components handle file upload, display, and format conversion automatically

Weaknesses:

  • Not designed for production APIs. The Gradio server is not built for concurrent traffic.
  • Limited customization. You can theme it, but you can't build a custom UI.
  • Single-threaded by default. Multiple users queue up.
  • No REST endpoint unless you use the API mode (Gradio 3.0+), which has its own quirks.
  • Hard to integrate with existing frontends.

Best for: Quick demos, research presentations, Hugging Face Spaces, internal model testing.

Streamlit

Built for data apps and dashboards.

Strengths:

  • The fastest path from Python to interactive UI. No HTML/CSS/JS needed.
  • Widgets (sliders, buttons, file uploads) work out of the box.
  • Re-runs the entire script on each interaction, which makes state management predictable.
  • Large community and component ecosystem.
  • Good for data-heavy apps with tables, charts, maps.

Weaknesses:

  • Re-running the script on every interaction means slow apps with heavy models.
  • No authentication or multi-user isolation.
  • Not suitable for REST APIs — it's UI-only.
  • Styling is limited to Streamlit's design system.
  • Session state leaks between users without careful management.

Best for: Internal dashboards, data exploration, quick prototypes, single-user tools.

FastAPI

Built for production APIs.

Strengths:

  • Designed for high-concurrency production workloads. Async support. Worker processes.
  • Auto-generated OpenAPI docs at /docs (Swagger UI).
  • Request validation via Pydantic. Type-safe. Auto-serialization.
  • Full control over the frontend. Build whatever UI you want in React/Vue/Svelte.
  • Built-in dependency injection, middleware, background tasks.
  • Health check endpoints, metrics, structured logging — all standard.
  • Can serve multiple models from one API.

Weaknesses:

  • You need to build your own frontend (or skip it and just have an API).
  • More code to get started compared to Gradio/Streamlit.
  • No built-in UI components — you're responsible for the entire user experience.

Best for: Production APIs, customer-facing inference endpoints, multi-model services, anything that needs to scale.

Comparison Matrix

GradioStreamlitFastAPI
Time to first demo10 minutes15 minutes1 hour (API only)
Time to productionNot recommendedWeeks (auth, scaling patches)Days (frontend needed)
Concurrent usersSingleSingle (multi-instance patches)Thousands
REST APILimited (3.0+)None (UI only)Built for it
Custom frontendNoNoYes (any framework)
GPU supportYesYesYes
AuthNoneNoneYou implement it
OpenAPI docsNoNoYes (auto)
Cold startFastFastFast

Decision Framework

Is this for a demo or internal tool? → Gradio or Streamlit. Gradio if it involves ML models directly. Streamlit if it's a dashboard or data app.

Is this a public-facing product that needs to scale? → FastAPI + custom frontend. You can use Gradio for the prototype, then rebuild in FastAPI once you validate the idea.

Do you need multi-user isolation? → FastAPI. Neither Gradio nor Streamlit handles this well at scale.

Do you need a REST API? → FastAPI. Streamlit can't. Gradio can but it's not the primary use case.

Is speed of development the priority? → Gradio for ML demos. Streamlit for data apps.

The Migration Path

A common pattern:

  1. Week 1: Build a Gradio demo on Hugging Face Spaces. Share with stakeholders.
  2. Week 2-4: Rebuild in FastAPI once requirements stabilize. Keep the Gradio demo for ongoing testing.
  3. Month 2: Build a proper frontend in React or just document the API for direct consumption.

Roptal detects which framework you're using (Gradio, Streamlit, or FastAPI) during repo analysis and auto-generates the right deployment configuration. Gradio gets multi-instance setup. Streamlit gets Redis-backed sessions. FastAPI gets production workers and health checks.

Gradio vs Streamlit vs FastAPI: Which to Use for Your ML App — Oryvo AI Blog